Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
717-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

717-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971282 50.865005)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971239 50.865001,-0.971241 50.865009,-0.971247 50.865017,-0.971256 50.865023,-0.971268 50.865027,-0.971281 50.865028,-0.971295 50.865027,-0.971307 50.865023,-0.971316 50.865017,-0.971322 50.865010,-0.971325 50.865001,-0.971323 50.864993,-0.971317 50.864986,-0.971308 50.864979,-0.971283 50.864974,-0.971269 50.864975,-0.971257 50.864979,-0.971248 50.864985,-0.971242 50.864992,-0.971239 50.865001)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL